JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 9, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Luis Angel Ochoa Echeverria

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad O Modificacion De Sentencia T-984/99
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acumulacion De Expedientes En Tutela
  • No atender petición de desacumulación no constituye nulidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud formulada por el accionante para que se declarara la nulidad de la Sentencia T-984/99, proferida por esta Corporación, y/o se modifique en lo que a él respecta como actor de la acción de tutela radicada y acumulada según la referencia.

La Corte explicó la petición de "desacumulación" que formuló el interesado, no es constitutiva de nulidad.

Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. DENEGAR la solicitud formulada por el senor Luis Angel Ocha Echeverria, para que se declare la nulidad de la sentencia T-984 de 9 de diciembre de 1999, proferida por la Sala Primera de Revision de esta Corporacion, y/o se modifique en lo que a el respecta como actor de la accion de tutela radicada bajo el numero T-236902, acumulada a la T-230933.
  2. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.